<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InResponse: Creational Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/</link>
	<description>spiritual storytelling, keeping faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: samuel gallo</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-247353</link>
		<dc:creator>samuel gallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-247353</guid>
		<description>Samuel Gallo

The structure of life I have described in buildings - the structure which I believe to be objective - is deeply and inextricably connected with the human person, and with the innermost nature of human feeling. 
Christopher Alexander

True love is always connected to doing things another persons way.  Becoming senseless and doing something absolutely crazy for the same of the better good is in my opinion a good cause of love.
I say all this to bring us to an altar of sacrifice and dedication to what we truly believe in. 
I believe that when Jesus went to the cross for us he did it because he saw what hell was like and in that he did something crazy, but he also established the church here on planet earth.
Sometimes it’s good to be crazy when we build up people who one day will dwell in huge majestic beautiful churches and also build those who will be in normal buildings and then have those who will be somewhere in a third world Country in a smaller humbler building. In the end I agree in seeing all three of these types flourish, but witch one is better I’m not sure.
I love being wherever there is humility and a band that rocks your socks off first thing Sunday morning. 
I also love hearing worship leaders bring trance music to the altar and do things like King DAVID DID like dancing around naked witch to me means dancing around a fire with dread lock hippies who spin the fire of God around the church, spreading everywhere the colours of true holiness and righteousness of God.
Freedom man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Gallo</p>
<p>The structure of life I have described in buildings &#8211; the structure which I believe to be objective &#8211; is deeply and inextricably connected with the human person, and with the innermost nature of human feeling.<br />
Christopher Alexander</p>
<p>True love is always connected to doing things another persons way.  Becoming senseless and doing something absolutely crazy for the same of the better good is in my opinion a good cause of love.<br />
I say all this to bring us to an altar of sacrifice and dedication to what we truly believe in.<br />
I believe that when Jesus went to the cross for us he did it because he saw what hell was like and in that he did something crazy, but he also established the church here on planet earth.<br />
Sometimes it’s good to be crazy when we build up people who one day will dwell in huge majestic beautiful churches and also build those who will be in normal buildings and then have those who will be somewhere in a third world Country in a smaller humbler building. In the end I agree in seeing all three of these types flourish, but witch one is better I’m not sure.<br />
I love being wherever there is humility and a band that rocks your socks off first thing Sunday morning.<br />
I also love hearing worship leaders bring trance music to the altar and do things like King DAVID DID like dancing around naked witch to me means dancing around a fire with dread lock hippies who spin the fire of God around the church, spreading everywhere the colours of true holiness and righteousness of God.<br />
Freedom man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianna</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-245422</link>
		<dc:creator>brianna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-245422</guid>
		<description>I just realized I had yet to respond to this post.

Our in class discussion on beauty was a good one. I of course am a woman of equilibrium, always seeking to find balance in my daily life of worship unto God.   

It was said over and over again in class that beauty should be sought in worship--but the counter; that being the idea that beauty does &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; matter in a physical space was also touched on. So where do we go from here? I would venture to say that both are right. 

Jesus was a man that went straight to the heart when asking a question of people. You find it throughout the entirety of the gospels. So we, in turn should seek to look into our hearts as a community and ask ourselves &quot;why do we seek beauty in things?&quot; 

People cannot deny that things which are beautiful call forth something deep within them. Just as when I look at a beautiful photo of a little girl, or a painting my mother has hung in our house... a building on the street... beauty is there. That beauty points me back to God--it makes me want to behold &lt;b&gt;His&lt;/b&gt; beauty. 

So is it important to be obsessing about ascetic in a physical structure? Is it important to be nit-picky about a certain carpet color, pews, or cross hanging in a church? No, it&#039;s not important to obsess over those things however there is something inside of each of us that desires gazing upon beauty, and because we can allow those things to direct us to God it&#039;s an alright thing to have a good looking building. Is it an end all? Do we &lt;b&gt;need&lt;/b&gt; it? I would say no, no we don&#039;t need a huge cathedral, however if the Lord speaks to us and says &quot;build me a cathedral where people can come and know me more&quot; then I say we do it. God can use whatever means possible to drawn people to Him. Those things can be either a shack of a building, or a church built out of stone over years and years of hard work. 

Psalm 96:6 Splendor and majesty are before Him,
Strength and beauty are in His sanctuary.

Psalm 27:4 One thing I have asked from the LORD, that I shall seek: That I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life, To behold the beauty of the LORD And to meditate in His temple.

When we dwell in His house; whether that be Him abiding in us or a physical structure we then gaze on His beauty. That can be literally meditating on Him, or looking at a beautiful piece of art that points us to Him. Do we need it? No. Is there a place for beauty in a worship space? Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized I had yet to respond to this post.</p>
<p>Our in class discussion on beauty was a good one. I of course am a woman of equilibrium, always seeking to find balance in my daily life of worship unto God.   </p>
<p>It was said over and over again in class that beauty should be sought in worship&#8211;but the counter; that being the idea that beauty does <b>not</b> matter in a physical space was also touched on. So where do we go from here? I would venture to say that both are right. </p>
<p>Jesus was a man that went straight to the heart when asking a question of people. You find it throughout the entirety of the gospels. So we, in turn should seek to look into our hearts as a community and ask ourselves &#8220;why do we seek beauty in things?&#8221; </p>
<p>People cannot deny that things which are beautiful call forth something deep within them. Just as when I look at a beautiful photo of a little girl, or a painting my mother has hung in our house&#8230; a building on the street&#8230; beauty is there. That beauty points me back to God&#8211;it makes me want to behold <b>His</b> beauty. </p>
<p>So is it important to be obsessing about ascetic in a physical structure? Is it important to be nit-picky about a certain carpet color, pews, or cross hanging in a church? No, it&#8217;s not important to obsess over those things however there is something inside of each of us that desires gazing upon beauty, and because we can allow those things to direct us to God it&#8217;s an alright thing to have a good looking building. Is it an end all? Do we <b>need</b> it? I would say no, no we don&#8217;t need a huge cathedral, however if the Lord speaks to us and says &#8220;build me a cathedral where people can come and know me more&#8221; then I say we do it. God can use whatever means possible to drawn people to Him. Those things can be either a shack of a building, or a church built out of stone over years and years of hard work. </p>
<p>Psalm 96:6 Splendor and majesty are before Him,<br />
Strength and beauty are in His sanctuary.</p>
<p>Psalm 27:4 One thing I have asked from the LORD, that I shall seek: That I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life, To behold the beauty of the LORD And to meditate in His temple.</p>
<p>When we dwell in His house; whether that be Him abiding in us or a physical structure we then gaze on His beauty. That can be literally meditating on Him, or looking at a beautiful piece of art that points us to Him. Do we need it? No. Is there a place for beauty in a worship space? Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-242668</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-242668</guid>
		<description>I have a two sided answer to whether a building or a worship environment needs to be beautiful. On one hand, i am astounded by a majestic architectural masterpiece that has taken years to create and i just cannot help but stand back and reflect on all the small designs and symbolism thats an individual took the time to crave or piant. These small designs help us reflect on Gods character and see his beauty. This a reminder to us that God beauty is reavealed through the gifts that people bring to the Lord.
I cannot help but see the beauty in this building because it just wasn&#039;t slapped togther but time and thought was poured into it.with this is mind i can look at the creativity and be inspired myself to create for God with everything i am. However, if the cost of this building is such a high price that the people of the church to afford and the church does in debt to afford the new structure or new addition then it is not worth it. The church serves the people not makes then go into debt or makes the structure more important than what happens inside its doors. However, becuase of north americian standard of living i think the church tries to place to big of a priority on the church instead of creating a space for those in there community to take part in the congregation. If the church is in a poor part of the city a grand church may not meet the needs of the community instead they just need a centre that they can fellowship in. A beaitiful building is not important biblicaly becuase the church doesn&#039;t live in a building it lives where ever there is a body of bleievers. In the bible the church met whereever. In a house, on a roof in a synogue. a beautiful building does not make the Lord invade that space any more than a single mom that calls to the Lord in her home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a two sided answer to whether a building or a worship environment needs to be beautiful. On one hand, i am astounded by a majestic architectural masterpiece that has taken years to create and i just cannot help but stand back and reflect on all the small designs and symbolism thats an individual took the time to crave or piant. These small designs help us reflect on Gods character and see his beauty. This a reminder to us that God beauty is reavealed through the gifts that people bring to the Lord.<br />
I cannot help but see the beauty in this building because it just wasn&#8217;t slapped togther but time and thought was poured into it.with this is mind i can look at the creativity and be inspired myself to create for God with everything i am. However, if the cost of this building is such a high price that the people of the church to afford and the church does in debt to afford the new structure or new addition then it is not worth it. The church serves the people not makes then go into debt or makes the structure more important than what happens inside its doors. However, becuase of north americian standard of living i think the church tries to place to big of a priority on the church instead of creating a space for those in there community to take part in the congregation. If the church is in a poor part of the city a grand church may not meet the needs of the community instead they just need a centre that they can fellowship in. A beaitiful building is not important biblicaly becuase the church doesn&#8217;t live in a building it lives where ever there is a body of bleievers. In the bible the church met whereever. In a house, on a roof in a synogue. a beautiful building does not make the Lord invade that space any more than a single mom that calls to the Lord in her home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-239419</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-239419</guid>
		<description>Mark, excellent addition to the conversation. From your artist/architect&#039;s perspective, could this be the seed thought that delivers a manifesto on church-connected architectures that the contemporary Church could actually read and appreciate? I would love to think so.

Joe, your comment wasn&#039;t edited or deleted. When first time comments from a source come in, they go into my moderation queue so I can confirm whether or not they are spam. About every 3 days I can actually check these, so it takes some time on occasion.

Everyone, excellent ideas. These may become fodder for later class discussions, as well. For first year university students, these guys are thinking strong thoughts. Good class, good class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, excellent addition to the conversation. From your artist/architect&#8217;s perspective, could this be the seed thought that delivers a manifesto on church-connected architectures that the contemporary Church could actually read and appreciate? I would love to think so.</p>
<p>Joe, your comment wasn&#8217;t edited or deleted. When first time comments from a source come in, they go into my moderation queue so I can confirm whether or not they are spam. About every 3 days I can actually check these, so it takes some time on occasion.</p>
<p>Everyone, excellent ideas. These may become fodder for later class discussions, as well. For first year university students, these guys are thinking strong thoughts. Good class, good class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark sider</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-238710</link>
		<dc:creator>mark sider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-238710</guid>
		<description>Please God, let this simple phrase escape the editor&#039;s scalpel. 

I would like to suggest that the question of beauty, as an end in itself, may not be the right one. I am going to put forward that beauty in art, in worship, in architecture is only one of a number of by-products of living a rich and full life. Possibly even one of the lesser by-products at that.

I appreciate the comment on the in-depth description of the Old Testament tabernacle. I too would point to it as a meaningful text. I would say though that its power and its poetry is not in its presentation of beauty but rather in its ability to communicate  rigor of its design intent. As with much of the context of this particular scripture it is for me about measurement and dimensions. How is the developing culture of the Jewish nation to measure itself. Old Testament scripture seems to indicate the it is through its focus on worship and caring for the vulnerable. The New Testament repeats that message... &#039;I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.&#039;

Justice and worship.

Evaluating these things based simply on our visceral response, &quot;do I find this beautiful?&quot; is, I find, unsatisfying. A better measurement of our art, our worship and our architecture, might come from the question, &quot;what larger message do these expressions communicate?&quot;. What are the extent of the dimensions it is describing. Is it an angry cry over an injustice... then let it be loud and strong. Do we have tears of sadness over loss... then let them flow unchecked. Are we in the midst of the ecstasy of miraculous love... then rejoice with all your might.

Are we being clear in what we communicate? Are we being true to our hearts and our minds? Are we, with integrity and excellence struggling through to find a larger language that can best be heard?

Out of this, may come beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please God, let this simple phrase escape the editor&#8217;s scalpel. </p>
<p>I would like to suggest that the question of beauty, as an end in itself, may not be the right one. I am going to put forward that beauty in art, in worship, in architecture is only one of a number of by-products of living a rich and full life. Possibly even one of the lesser by-products at that.</p>
<p>I appreciate the comment on the in-depth description of the Old Testament tabernacle. I too would point to it as a meaningful text. I would say though that its power and its poetry is not in its presentation of beauty but rather in its ability to communicate  rigor of its design intent. As with much of the context of this particular scripture it is for me about measurement and dimensions. How is the developing culture of the Jewish nation to measure itself. Old Testament scripture seems to indicate the it is through its focus on worship and caring for the vulnerable. The New Testament repeats that message&#8230; &#8216;I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.&#8217;</p>
<p>Justice and worship.</p>
<p>Evaluating these things based simply on our visceral response, &#8220;do I find this beautiful?&#8221; is, I find, unsatisfying. A better measurement of our art, our worship and our architecture, might come from the question, &#8220;what larger message do these expressions communicate?&#8221;. What are the extent of the dimensions it is describing. Is it an angry cry over an injustice&#8230; then let it be loud and strong. Do we have tears of sadness over loss&#8230; then let them flow unchecked. Are we in the midst of the ecstasy of miraculous love&#8230; then rejoice with all your might.</p>
<p>Are we being clear in what we communicate? Are we being true to our hearts and our minds? Are we, with integrity and excellence struggling through to find a larger language that can best be heard?</p>
<p>Out of this, may come beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe troyer</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-237771</link>
		<dc:creator>joe troyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-237771</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

I left a comment here yesterday.It got removed. Do you know why? Sorry to leave this message here. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>I left a comment here yesterday.It got removed. Do you know why? Sorry to leave this message here. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-236677</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-236677</guid>
		<description>Beautiful and strong ideas are brimming here, guys. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful and strong ideas are brimming here, guys. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Funk</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-236354</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Funk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-236354</guid>
		<description>Aw man, I think I need to get better at taking notes in class, especially writing down my own thoughts when they pop up… . But anyways, I really appreciated our discussion on Creational Theology. I had never heard of this term before. I found myself actually excited about it once we started into what defines Creational theology. It may help to quickly recap the ideas of Creational Theology as discussed in our class: 
- There IS good in the physical world;
- God’s plan for redemption extends into redeeming ALL creation;
- All beauty is God’s beauty, all truth is God’s truth;
- Goodness of life can be enjoyed, the brokenness can be challenged;
- The act of creativity calls out creativity in others;
- We are creative partners in the creative and redemptive project;
- Creativity and music sensitizes people to the story all around them.
I found myself excited about this because it speaks to something deeper inside of me. It says something more of the world around me: God is intimate and involved with his creation. He works creatively and redemptively. God has made beauty in the created, physical world. He created and said it was good (Gen 1). Creation was made in such a way to bring men and women to be confronted with the evidence of God (Rom. 2). There is goodness and beauty to be appreciated. 
I think creational theology is relevant to how we can view even our church buildings. God has given man the capacity for creativity, to be able to construct beautiful buildings and places of worship. As the imagebearers (using Dan&#039;s term here) of God, our creativity brings him worship in its action and brings him worship by pointing us to the fact that there is a creator behind the beautiful things. There is ultimately a Creator God. There is a place for a beautiful buildings of worship. It can be a place to exercise the creative gifts we have been given in worship (which reflects the creativity andglory of God) and it is a place that God can call out to us, that beauty has a source. All beauty is God’s beauty and all truth is God’s truth. And as a painting has some of the painter in it, so the creation has the glimpse of the Creator in it. When we acknowledge the source of this wonderful beauty, Creator God, we also worship him. So in a beautiful building, as in creation, God calls us to himself.
Wow, so much more needs to be said, and I really don’t have the ability to think it through and express it concisely. I agree totally with my classmates that the church community is not about the building, and I don’t think it should be. There is a huge inner dimension of the heart that God calls beauty out of, which is expressed in community. But God uses beauty, physical or communal, to call hearts to himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw man, I think I need to get better at taking notes in class, especially writing down my own thoughts when they pop up… . But anyways, I really appreciated our discussion on Creational Theology. I had never heard of this term before. I found myself actually excited about it once we started into what defines Creational theology. It may help to quickly recap the ideas of Creational Theology as discussed in our class:<br />
- There IS good in the physical world;<br />
- God’s plan for redemption extends into redeeming ALL creation;<br />
- All beauty is God’s beauty, all truth is God’s truth;<br />
- Goodness of life can be enjoyed, the brokenness can be challenged;<br />
- The act of creativity calls out creativity in others;<br />
- We are creative partners in the creative and redemptive project;<br />
- Creativity and music sensitizes people to the story all around them.<br />
I found myself excited about this because it speaks to something deeper inside of me. It says something more of the world around me: God is intimate and involved with his creation. He works creatively and redemptively. God has made beauty in the created, physical world. He created and said it was good (Gen 1). Creation was made in such a way to bring men and women to be confronted with the evidence of God (Rom. 2). There is goodness and beauty to be appreciated.<br />
I think creational theology is relevant to how we can view even our church buildings. God has given man the capacity for creativity, to be able to construct beautiful buildings and places of worship. As the imagebearers (using Dan&#8217;s term here) of God, our creativity brings him worship in its action and brings him worship by pointing us to the fact that there is a creator behind the beautiful things. There is ultimately a Creator God. There is a place for a beautiful buildings of worship. It can be a place to exercise the creative gifts we have been given in worship (which reflects the creativity andglory of God) and it is a place that God can call out to us, that beauty has a source. All beauty is God’s beauty and all truth is God’s truth. And as a painting has some of the painter in it, so the creation has the glimpse of the Creator in it. When we acknowledge the source of this wonderful beauty, Creator God, we also worship him. So in a beautiful building, as in creation, God calls us to himself.<br />
Wow, so much more needs to be said, and I really don’t have the ability to think it through and express it concisely. I agree totally with my classmates that the church community is not about the building, and I don’t think it should be. There is a huge inner dimension of the heart that God calls beauty out of, which is expressed in community. But God uses beauty, physical or communal, to call hearts to himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Troyer</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-236121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Troyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-236121</guid>
		<description>Dan,
I don&#039;t get to your site very often, but this is a good question. I guess I have always felt that the temple of the OT is not the church of today. It wasn&#039;t meant to be the &quot;christian version&quot; of the Solomon&#039;s Temple. The temple was the place where God met humanity so to speak. Now, we are.

We as followers of Jesus are now the place where God meets the world. We, being the temple of God, are the holy place. Not the church. This also has to do with dualism.

Dualism can say that church is more sacred where other places are not. So we adorn our churches and make them lavish as to &quot;honor God&quot;. But to be honest, the sacred places are the places we put our feet to. I personally believe that a place is made sacred by bringing Jesus there. And that is what we do as followers of Christ. The bar you walk into. The classroom you sit in. The living room you watch tv in. Taking your kid to the zoo can be sacred. That&#039;s all I got to say about that.

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
I don&#8217;t get to your site very often, but this is a good question. I guess I have always felt that the temple of the OT is not the church of today. It wasn&#8217;t meant to be the &#8220;christian version&#8221; of the Solomon&#8217;s Temple. The temple was the place where God met humanity so to speak. Now, we are.</p>
<p>We as followers of Jesus are now the place where God meets the world. We, being the temple of God, are the holy place. Not the church. This also has to do with dualism.</p>
<p>Dualism can say that church is more sacred where other places are not. So we adorn our churches and make them lavish as to &#8220;honor God&#8221;. But to be honest, the sacred places are the places we put our feet to. I personally believe that a place is made sacred by bringing Jesus there. And that is what we do as followers of Christ. The bar you walk into. The classroom you sit in. The living room you watch tv in. Taking your kid to the zoo can be sacred. That&#8217;s all I got to say about that.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Carmody</title>
		<link>http://www.danwilt.com/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-235370</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Carmody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwilt.com/index.php/inresponse-creational-theology/#comment-235370</guid>
		<description>Is there a word limite???  Mine is only 500 words.  Helppp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a word limite???  Mine is only 500 words.  Helppp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

