STUMBLING INTO MYSTERY: Toward A Theology Of Worship
Dan Wilt, M.Min.
Director, The Institute Of Contemporary And Emerging Worship Studies
St. Stephen’s University
To formulate a rich and powerful theology of worship is to engage the most essential questions of humankind, the most vital revelations of human history, and the most practical activities of human experience. In short, to embrace that a clear theology of worship is not only helpful, but of highest human necessity, is to begin to see the full scope of the silver thread of worship that weaves throughout this magical universe.
Found On Other Planets: Worship
Cosmologist George Ellis once suggested that if we communicate at some point with sentient life on other planets, we will find two things. Firstly, we will find that these creatures understand mathematics. Using their own terms, and building on their own histories, storytelling, discoveries and biology, these beings will understand the majestic order that provides a framework for understanding the shape and tendencies of such a rambunctious, chaotic universe. Secondly, Ellis suggests that these creatures will understand what he calls the “Kenotic Ethic.” The word “kenotic” comes from the Greek word “kenosis,” which means “to empty.” Ellis suggests that our new celestial friends will understand that giving oneself, emptying oneself, epitomized in Jesus’ self-offering in the garden of Gethsemane, is the only true way to peace, healing and restoration in any given universe.
While these two ideas are bright with beauty and possibility, I would add at least one more probability to Ellis’ duo. I would add that upon meeting these creatures, and hearing about the nature of their life, history and daily experience, we would begin to hear – very soon into the conversation – words and ideas related to worship. In the fabric of the universe is an impulse – an impulse to live in, return to, and reclaim the proper order of things. It is an impulse toward Eden, toward origins and beginnings. Our destabilization (what we call the Fall on earth) has created a sense of longing vibrating in every human cell (Scripture also suggests it resonates in the entirety of this creation) for a relationship that encompasses other human beings, creation and yet something beyond. That impulse and intuition seems to largely endure in individuals, guided by particular visions of faith and stories of reality, if not consciously restrained.
It is a desire to return to love, to return to the dance, to return to the life of adoration (and the life that flows among us when we live in this state) for which we are made. Worship is the completing of the circle of love into which we have been invited by a self-revealing God. To misunderstand worship, to fail to articulate its content and themes well, is to fail to find the meaning pregnant in every spousal kiss, act of kindness, mundane chore, serendipitous glance and invigorating breath.
Everything we are, and everything we do, hinges on our conscious approach to developing a living theology of worship that takes into account the wildest gifts and deepest rifts that exist in the human consciousness – and in the creation in which we find ourselves.
Digital And Analog Worship Theology
Let’s get something out of the way, for starters. Theology that is digital – that is all 1’s and 0’s- makes no living sense to this generation. Digital theology is surgically precise theology. It is manifest in ways of seeing, thinking and talking about God that leave little room for error, aberration or dissonance. Something in our makeup tells us that holy mysteries, as Peterson puts it, should never be reduced to slogans or simple answers.
Analog theology, however, is filled with the hiss and the sounds of the stories in which we live. In analog recording, there is no objective, musical “perfection” with which all things line up neatly and are defined as “the perfect music.” There are options, with principles leading, guiding and ultimately shaping the music. The stories of your life and mine are filled with the raw noise of experience, and the experience of those who have gone before us. The Bible seems to affirm that this kind of experience is not only common, but it may be at the very center of the way that God interacts with His world.
If theology is approached as a systematic math equation, leading us to a true understanding of God and our place in His world, then it had better be the longest, most obtuse, most breathtaking and infinite math equation of them all. The reason we as human beings are storytelling creatures (and are drawn to stories like bees to honey), is because we innately understand that we live in a relational narrative, rather than a concise equation.
Theology that is rich, strong, true, and ultimately biblical, is theology that holds in it the analog hiss, the mystery, the wonder, the pain of being a human being in a shared cosmic and communal story. If worship theology will begin to take us toward envisioning the God of heaven and the earth from the foundation of expressed revelation (the Scriptures), then we had better get this straight from the top. Any journey in worship theology worth our time will be messy, wonderful, exhilarating and sickening. Worship theology that is pristine and polished is all 1’s and 0’s – helpful for doing the math of theology, but ultimately inadequate for incarnationally living it out in the world we inhabit.
To say it one more way, if for a moment we believe that essence of worship can be fully captured in a few slogans, scriptures or quick statements, then we had better dismiss the complexity inherent to the cosmos, or even the incomparable mystery of the Sovereign Father, Resurrected Son and Indwelling Spirit active in this very moment of your life and mine.
We Start With Something
To our great benefit, and in contrast to the what the voices of the new atheism may say, I (possibly ‘we’ if you are a Christian reading this) believe that the God of the universe has not remain hidden, nor will he suffer Himself to be disconnected from His works of art. He doesn’t play games with humanity, thrusting us into this undulating universe and then throwing away any description of why we might be here.
How vile this thought would be, to stare into the stunning starfields at night and to believe that our gift of consciousness for beholding these wonders will simply to lead us to the ultimate trap of meaninglessness and further unknowing. One would think that the joy of discovery for any scientist is just that, a joy, because it feels as though it is leading us somewhere. The Celtic Christians would have lifted their voices centuries ago and cried out, “No! Leading us to Someone.” A destination that ends in a Person was all that the Celtic believers could perceive not only as an accurate way of knowing and being, but as a truly worthwhile form of knowing and being.
The God we worship as Christians is a God who self reveals – who invites us into revelation by not remaining hidden, not remaining distant. This is a God who suffers with, suffers for, suffers among. This is a God who takes on flesh and blood, who incarnates to make His point. This kind of God is the opposite of the “unknown force” that leads us to discoveries only for the purpose of acquiring knowledge, feeling good about the progress of the race, heightening our evolution (to what end?) and placing ourselves on the throne of the All-Knowing One because we found hydrogen in a dust cloud. Majestic as science is, and fantastical as human spirituality and intuition can be, a God who leaves us to fend for ourselves seems to me to be the ultimate Poor Parent.
We are given a guide – the Scriptures – to lead us forward as living communities welcoming the Spirit’s leadership. Despite our diverse understandings of these authoritative letters, histories, songs, prophecies and stories, we are rooted by the Bible in a vision of God offered across tumultuous time through a single tribe in our ancient human family – the Jews. If we have enough imagination to recognize that this is indeed what God has done to self-reveal – He has particularly selected a people through which to speak a story into the world (in an age where the faulty concept of tolerance is deified, this is untenable) – then we have begun our journey toward becoming truly human in the way of Jesus.
Getting Beyond The Music
Because this God draws near, there is purpose to a life, to our relationships, to the creation and to the dance into which we are invited with God Himself. This is the foundational theme that should run through any theology of worship to which we come. The cosmos has a purpose – it is part of a Story, not existing as its own story.
As we begin to consider a theology and worldview of worship (the theme of our Essentials Blue online seminar), there are a few factors we must always come back to if we are to be thorough. We must get far beyond the music of worship, the liturgies of worship, the affections we may have for certain types of gathered worship. In fact, we must even get beyond simplistic visions of the “living sacrifice” of worship that is our current ruling framework for a worshipper’s life in the Church. While important and beautiful in its reflection on worship, it is only one idea about worship (and again, a stunning and magnificent one at that), and one that makes us the Subject of the sentence, and God the object.
Embracing this, we must begin to formulate a narrative voicing of worship theology that makes God the Subject of the sentence, the one who enacts all the verbs of relationship, toward the Objects of His affection. Worship begins in God, finds its definition in God’s actions, and its fruit and welcoming opportunities in us – the objects of God’s pursuing love.
I will note here how we begin to approach such an expansive idea as worship theology here at the Institute Of Contemporary And Emerging Worship Studies. All of our online seminars, courses, webinars and Masters courses seek to pursue the articulation, and sacramental embodying of these ideas, in creative spiritual leaders across the planet. It is my hope that our framework, though flawed, can serve as a starting point for the integration of the vast worlds of faith, the arts, history, the sciences, culture, anthropology, ecology and all spheres of human relationships and experience in our approach to worship.
Toward Formulating A Theology Of Worship
While any grid for approaching the wide and wild world of worship will have its flaws, this approach has proven very helpful to hundreds of worship leaders, creative artists, musicians, pastors and worship leaders across the world. Drawing on N.T. Wright’s book, Simply Christian, we seek to frame a worship theology and worldview that is understandable and compelling to the postmodern mind. From the reflections on worship theology and worldview that flow among our groups, a wide variety of artistic, creative and innovate embodiments of worship theology rise from the hearts of participants. If the artists speak a living Story that is more compelling than the stories of the age, we may have a chance to lead people to encounter with the God who injects His life into each person’s unique Story, and seeds it with the holy virus of New Creation.
Here are our three categories, forming a trinity of ideas that tumble over one another in formulating what might begin to be a more comprehensive worship theology than we may have embraced to date.
1. Our Theology Of Worship should first articulate a clear view of who we believe that God has revealed Himself to be.
As human beings, seeking to perceive Who God is and how we are to relate to Him, we turn to reflection on:
- God as Creator (the God who makes),
- God as King (the God who reigns),
- God as Trinity (the God who relates and reveals) and
- God as Savior (the God who acts).
2. Our Theology Of Worship should articulate a clear view of who we believe that human beings are revealed to be.
As human beings perceiving and exploring the wonders of the God who makes, reigns, relates/reveals and acts, we next turn to reflection on:
- Human beings as SubCreators (people who make and share),
- Human beings as ImageBearers (people who reign and steward),
- Human beings as CommunityBuilders (people who relate and reveal) and
- Human beings as SalvificStorytellers (people who tell and act)
3. Our Theology Of Worship should articulate a clear view of what worship is given that God is the subject of worship, and people are the object of God’s affection.
Finally, as human beings who now, from our vantage point, seek to be in the center of “the design of things,” we move toward reflection on:
- Worship as a Creative Act (to worship is to make and to share the gifts of that making),
- Worship as a Royal Act (to worship is to steward and benevolently reign in creation),
- Worship as a Relational Act (to worship is to relate rightly to God, people, the creation and the whole community of living and non-living things), and
- Worship as a Narrative Act (to worship is to tell and retell a story that provides the optimal context for the universe, and to act in accord with that story).
In light of these three steps toward developing a theology (and practice) of worship, I believe that we can safely find a haven for all of the experiences that mark the human condition, the revelations that God has so generously distributed to us in the Scriptures (and in creation), the creativity that flows from us as we seek to commune with the invisible God in this world, and possible solutions to bear to the world for moving us toward the New Creation that is to come – a new creation inaugurated in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus.
For Those Interested In More
For those interested in furthering their reflection on this vision of worship, we offer our online Essentials Course. Online via Facebook, iTunes U and blogs we explore ideas in Worship Theology and Worldview (Essentials Blue – Simply Christian), Worship History and Creative Vocation (Essentials Red – Ancient-Future Time) and Worship Values and Spiritual Formation (Essentials Green – Devotional Classics). All courses are offered in a 5 week, innovative seminar format for worshipping Christians in any stream of the Church, with an emphasis on musicians, worship leaders and creative artists. The Essentials Course is also available for university credit through St. Stephen’s University in New Brunswick, Canada.
We also have an upcoming, full year Essentials Worship Team Subscription for any local church wanting us to help them to nurture their worship team or creative ministry’s vision of worship. This subscription includes the Essentials Course, monthly webinars, group study tools and more, and is already being piloted with hundreds of worship musicians around the world. Contact us for more information at the site, sign up for our newsletter, and look for info to come.
The Institute Of Contemporary And Emerging Worship Studies seeks to be a nexus of worship past, present and future for the equipping of the contemporary and emerging Church of the 21st century.
Email this article to a friend.
25 Comments
loved the analog/digital analogy Dan, very well put.
It’s so easy to grab onto the idea that worship is an act of our love poured out, that we initiate, instead of the idea that our worship is a response to God’s love poured out over us.
The subject vs. object language is very helpful in furthering the development of my worship theology foundation. Thanks for posting this Dan!
Hi Dan,
I love the journey you’re on to develop a theology of worship, and I agree with the previous commentator — the analog / digital analogy is brilliant. I just have one theological critique of the following sentence:
If we have enough imagination to recognize that this is indeed what God has done to self-reveal – He has particularly selected a people through which to speak a story into the world (in an age where the faulty concept of tolerance is deified, this is untenable) – then we have begun our journey toward becoming truly human in the way of the new Adam, Jesus.
I hope this doesn’t sound “too digital” but the scriptures never speak of Jesus as the new Adam, or the second Adam. (I got this from reading Watchman Nee years ago!) There is the first Adam, also called the first man, and the Last Adam, referring to Jesus. Jesus is then referred to as the second man. (See I Corinthians 15:45).
So what difference does it make? In short, Jesus brings a complete and utter end to Adam’s race at the cross. We can’t go back to try to “fix it”. It’s too late. The judgment has already come. The Risen Lord Jesus inaugurates a whole new creation, and if any one is in Christ, then he too has become a new creation. Everything old has passed away. EVERYTHING has become new in Him. (See II Cor. 5:16, 17)
The unfolding mystery of a new creation, of which I am now a part, compels me to worship like nothing else can. This one who makes all things new — what is He doing to me? As He changes me and others into His likeness by revealing His glory, I see something new about Him everyday that compels me to worship. He is fashioning a whole new race and a whole new creation, but one perceived only by “the eyes of the heart.” My worship is a response to that revelation, not only of who He is, but of what He is doing.
I could go on . . . Thanks for the invitation into the dialogue.
Love and Blessings,
Don
Very well put Dan. I love the analog digital comparison, very apt. And I am intrigued by the flip of object and subject of the sentence – what would that mean in the way I live my life?
I am sorry that the chosen audience or student of this is limited by our understanding of the term ‘worship’ though…this stuff sounds like stuff for every believer who wishes to live as a reflection of our God in the world. I am sorry that since it is classified under ‘worship studies’ those of us without musical gifts pass this by. In fact it is the call of every christian to live a life of worship and to lead/encourage each other in this, is it not?
I myself have set this aside thinking it is not for me, since I am not a musician or even an artist. But I read this and I feel like I should find some reason to be included, since I too want to live a life of worship everyday, especially at work as I try to love the unlovely, but also throughout my life.
thoughtfully
Shelley
Reading things like this reminds me of how incredibly different God makes us, Dan.
I figure at best, I got half of it, even reading it carefully.
And that’s because my lens is so distinct from yours. It is what I love about you, because you have always prodded me gently into trying to embrace the Mystery.
May this non-musician always have the pleasure of fellow believers like you causing me to think in new ways about my Creator!
Thanks for chiming in everyone. Don, I’m going to chew on what you’ve said, and as always, you have my great respect as a theological voice and pastor of souls.
I’ll do my homework, and then probably change the way I’ve written it to what you said!
This is the gift of a blog – input like this.
Thanks so much all.
I just love mystery…….. and as a dear brother once told me ” some things will just always be a mystery”. Nice job putting words around that thinking. I love the poetic flow of the writing…..
be blessed
steve
Hi Dan,
I am soooo impressed that you were able to use both the word “rambunctious” and the word “salvific” in the same blog! Very nice. You do have a way with words!
On a more serious note though, I have just finished reading Marva J. Dawn’s “Reaching Out Without Dumbing Down – A Theology of Worship for this Urgent Time” and am now poring back over it, mining out the gems, in an effort to use her writing as a springboard for articulating my own (however yet flawed and faulty) analog worship theology. Your thoughts have come at a splendiferous and opportune time, providing a framework upon which the hiss and flow of my growing theology can flourish – much like the stave gives the framework for a melody to be written, or the structure a sheet of lattice provides for a vine to grow up, in its myriad ways, forms and directions. Neither analogy really fits 100%, but I hope you get the drift.
I appreciate what you have to say about theology – that it is something that should be alive and growing us up into Christ – it is not a static thing. I guess it could be said that when it comes to theology, you can bet that no matter what you believe, while we are this side of the fullness of New Creation, it’s never going to be 100% correct. There is always something new to ponder, better questions to ask, deeper revelation to receive and more beauty in the One than we will ever fully comprehend.
I think the discovery and development of a sound worship theology (one that is continually being refined and rediscovered in all its surprising ways) requires faithfulness to the Word and the soft whispers of the Spirit to gentle guide us in His wisdom. Thanks Dan for helping facilitate that journey once again and helping us to see that our God-given creativity and artistry can enable us to both appreciate our role as sub-creators and image-bearers, as well as encouraging us to step more fully into our Calling to tell the Story in myriad ways, ushering in New Creation as we do so: by His grace, in His strength and for His glory. Amen!
Great comments guys.
Don, I am deferring to you here, as textually and theologically, you’re right. Could you point me to some good resources on the topic of Jesus as the last Adam (the passages are clear), and the Jesus/Adam connection?
To some degree, I was being prosaic/poetic in referring to Jesus as the “new” Adam, but looseness with words is always dicey when doing good theology (this is a common issue of pain throughout church history between the arts and the Church).
My desire was to use the “new humanity” language in a way that would call us to be ambassadors of new creation.
I’d love to advance my own learning in this area by some good reference points from you. I’ve taken the word “new” out, as it think it will be more helpful than putting in “last” theologically.
Any other passages would be helpful as well, as I don’t have time to do much research right now.
Dan,
I thoroughly enjoyed this. I’m working on completing the application process for The Institute Of Contemporary And Emerging Worship Studies at SSU, this only makes me more excited to have a chance to study worship at such an intense level.
Thanks so much for sharing, you’ve definitely given me much to think about.
~Bri~
Your article ia a stimulus package in and of itself!
I very much appreciate the digital/analog metaphor of what worship is.
The best worship often is messy, something I learned as a chaplain at the Health Sciences Center in Winnipeg. Worship in the hospital context has to cut it where the rubber hits the road; if it doesn’t reflect and speak to people’s deepest needs and issues, it can be like drinking a glass of water on a hot day – and still being thirsty.
The challenge to the worship leader is one of containing the anxieties of the group so as to enable everyone to explore the “mess” – those ambiguities and concerns that press for ultimacy (cf Tillich) as we search the existential landscape for the giver of living water.
I’ll be reflecting on your article for a while yet, I am sure. Thank you.
Daly
This is a beautiful summary of the Essentials Blue course. By reading this I am reminded that our worship is not just about the one true God, but also the crown of his creation, His image bearers on this earth!
I recently has the opportunity to track a band using 2 inch tape (the way they used to capture music) instead of pro tools (computers) and I must say the analogy rings deep for me. Even if you can’t tell the difference in the sound, there is a relaxing and mysterious thing that happens in the process of having to wait for the tape to rewind and align. There is a bit of nostalgia and patience added to the experience. Additionally, the limitations in analog require creative solutions, you can’t just have 1,000 voices layered on each other quickly, you have to think. It’s wonderful!
I hope that my theology of worship leads me to better questions and longer thoughts on God.
Beautiful words, Mike. Cheers to the moments you wait for the tape to rewind. May the click and the hum hold you fast to eternal things.
Daly, thanks for the insights from your world, and a reminder of the press for ultimacy.
Dan,
I dropped out of the conversation when I accidently deleted the email or the link or whatever . . . anyway, when I had time I googled and found the blog again. I’ve been looking through my library and have discovered that many of the books I loaned out apparently never came back, so I’m fully dependent on my memory. I know that it was from the writings of Watchman Nee that I got this insight, and it was quite well developed. I can’t be certain, but I’m quite sure it was in “The Normal Christian Life”.
You will note another contrast a little further on in the text of I Cor. 15, verses 47 – 49 between the man of dust and the man of heaven. Paul seems to be going overboard to underscore the fact that Adam and Jesus have two distinctly different natures. And a variant reading in verse 49, “let us also bear the image of the man of heaven”, implies that it is possible right now, not just in the future, and a choice that we can make.
Having said that, I can certainly appreciate the challenge in trying to find both biblically accurate and, at the same time, poetic ways to express the idea of the new humanity.
If I can find further resources on this, I’ll certainly let you know. Bless you!
I’ve really enjoyed the concepts of Essentials Blue for it has renewed my sense of purpose because of who God is.
I have a creative side in songwriting, photography in fact in every area of my life I can be creative because God is creative.
I act justly, love mercy and walk humble because I am an imagebearer, a representation of God.
I live in community, with my church family but also in activity with others, because God is a communal God.
Finally God is a savior and has set me apart of the Gospel of Christ and I have a story to tell.
Knowing who God is brings a sense of purpose and identity into my life as to who I am and how I can continue to serve Him with greater enthusiasm.
very well said Lewis!
Dan,
Great post – exceptional actually. Some great thinking.
I dig that digital/analog metaphor – very helpful – as our inability to see clearly with certainty in this world (or objectively) is one many accept begrudgingly – but still must accept.
I also love the parallel’s you draw out between what we can know of God and what we can know of man… the parallels between creating and relating and participating in salvific history…
One thought I think I might add that is clearly a part of our worship AND a necessary antidote to our culture – is the place of REST (Sabbath) in our theology of worship. Rest comes clearly from God finishing His creation work and he established that pattern… So in Gen. 1 – we can see that we are made in God’s image – in at least three ways – God Creates; God Relates; and God Rests — we are privileged to follow suit in participating in Creation (having dominion; be fruitful); Relating to one another, creation and God; and are called to follow the command to Rest from our work and trust God’s provision.
Anyway just thought I would chime in here… good to see a Messiah Grad representing so well.
Peace! (a fellow Messiah ‘88 Grad)
I love the digital/analog analogy. In my experience, diving into theology is more like trying to discover the origin and character of sound. I think of all of the scientists and engineers dedicated to synthesizing and modeling sound. I am sure that their experience is much like ours. The more they learn about the object of their studies, the more they discover they don’t understand.
From the beginning of time until the end of time, we will continue to unfold the layers of faith, God and theological understanding, yet we will never “arrive”. There is, however, so much beauty in the journey. Additionally, I believe that every new taste of God leaves us hungry for more. That’s why some of us will devote our lives to digging ever deeper into the question of who God is.
I’m glad to be taking the journey with so many great fellow travelers!
Great interjection, Adam. Rich offerings, you bring!
Nice post Dan. I, as everybody else, really like the digital/analogue analogy.
Worship, as I have understood it, is simply glorifying God. I say “have” because lately I have realized that there is much more to it than that. Up to this point I haven’t been able to define these realizations but I am hoping that Essentials Blue will help me with that.
So far I have found it quite an interesting course.
-Clifton
Hey Dan,
I love the digital / analog analogy you use. There is something so visceral and real that you find when listening to analog recordings. The imperfection yet beauty of life somehow captured without being sanitized or quantized.
You have a way with words, and I truly look forward to digging into these ideas over the coming weeks in the essentials blue course.
Cheers,
Stephen
For me one of the things that gives one the analogue tone we all love from theology, is to use the tubes of revelation. When our thought’s are merely the product of the best human reasoning or logical linear thought humans are capable of, we end up with the squeaky clean digital signal at best. At worst it becomes dogmatic and legalistic leaving us nothing of God himself.
We need to go back to the practices of the past to get that vintage tone, and that means making time for revelation to take place. To open the scriptures and give God time to reveal Himself and let Him paint the picture that He wants. When revelation penetrates our reality we getthat awesome warm imperfect but true tone of the person Truth (John 1).
The Apostle Paul for me is such an example of this as he never denies all his impressive theological training he recieved and in fact he uses it to great effect. However all that training didn’t change his life and meant nothing until he had a personal analogue encounter with Jesus Christ. He also had a period of time out of the spotlight where Jesus was breathing life and tone into his theology and teaching.
That’s the signal I want to give out and it’s those people with the analogue sound that I want to follow
Vintage tone – reclaiming a sound vs. nostalgia. I like it Justin.
I liked reading that post, as a whole but there is one thing I really loved : it is the reminder that no one on earth is an orphan, the reminder of how God is fully engaged in our human history, whether we acknowledge it or not. That he is the beginning and the end of that story.
I know the list of things to reflect upon in terms of the theology of worship is not exhaustive, so I would like to add some of the things that I think are necessary to think about when engaging in worship:
- God as our parent, responsible, present, growing us and letting us learn
- worship as a natural response to who God is. The verses in Revelation about the ongoing worship always stir in me that feeling : all the creatures described there ( some of them quite scary when I think about it) respond naturally to God by worshipping him.
Incoming Links
Leave a Reply